مقالے کی معلومات
جلد
شمارہ
مقالے کی قسم
زبان
تلخیص
Objective: To observe the effects of Active Self Propelled Wheel Chairs versus Regular (Standard) Wheel Chairs on Quality of Life in Paraplegic Population. Materials and Methods: This observational study was conducted in three union councils of district Swat from the period of January to December 2012. The total of 50 paraplegic patients were selected and placed into two groups. After taking a written consent Active Wheel Chair Self Propelled was provided to the patients in group A, and Regular Wheel Chair Standard to the patients in group B. Initially all the patients were trained for the proper use of wheel chair. The baseline characteristics were same in all patients. The individual prioritize problem assessment instrument (IPPA) was used an assessment toll, and it measures the effects of assistive technology. IPPA score was calculated for all patients at baseline and after 3 months use of wheel chairs. Results: The quality of life was significantly more enhanced in group A with Active Self Propelled Wheel Chairs (P=0.001), as compared to group B with Regular Standard Wheel Chairs (P=0.541), in paraplegic population, as assessed by the individual prioritize problem assessment instrument (IPPA). Conclusion: The Active Self Propelled Wheel Chairs are more effective for the enhancement in quality of life, as Compare to Regular Standard Wheel Chairs in Paraplegic Population.
Syed Shakil-ur-Rehman, Ikram Ali, Asghar Khan, Fozia Sibtain . (2014) Effects of Active Self Propelled Wheel Chairs versus Regular Standard Wheel Chairs on Quality of Life in Paraplegic Population, Journal of Islamic International Medical College, Volume-9, Issue-2.
-
Views
942 -
Downloads
72