Abstract
Jurisprudence is in fact, the knowledge of Islamic law, its importance cannot be denied, because the Qur'an and Hadith contain clear instructions on the need and importance of jurisprudence per religion. Therefore, under the will of Allah, the scholars of jurisprudence in every age have rendered great services in the field of jurisprudence. There has always been a difference of opinion among the jurists in interpreting the jurisprudential laws in the light of the Qur'an and Sunnah and in their practical application according to the needs of the times. The books of jurisprudence are full of these jurisprudential differences. As a result of which some gentlemen either turn away from the scholarly efforts of the scholars or reopen the door of modern ijtihad, because the stock of jurisprudence cannot be ignored, so it is necessary to clarify the real reasons, causes and etiquettes of these jurisprudential differences in order to save the Ummah from intellectual confusion. This difference was also present in the time of Prophet (pbuh) and is often seen in later times. This difference of opinion among the jurists is a blessing of Allah and a great legal jurisprudential capital, which has given the ummah a great deal of openness and ease in the Shari'ah. Therefore, it is a misunderstanding to consider jurisprudential differences as defects or contradictions in religion.
Dr Altaf Hassan, Aziz ur Rehman Saifee. (2020) Reasons For Jurisprudential Differences And Its Etiquettes, The International Research Journal Department of Usooluddin, Volume-04, Issue-1.
-
Views
612 -
Downloads
50
Article Details
Volume
Issue
Type
Language
