Abstract
Leadership effectiveness has become increasingly complex issues,
requiring a range of skills and competencies to achieve management
goals globally. Leadership is essentially a behavioral process of
creating followers, persuading individuals or groups of people toward
set goals, and it success is contingent upon how these goals are
achieved. The paper in hand aims at developing an empirical framework
and determining efficacy of variables towards leadership effectiveness
which is critical determinant of organizational sustainability. Further it
seeks to enunciate the intrinsic value of leadership effectiveness and
personnel ability to build around key competencies, across or vital
functional areas in order to enhance competitive advantage worldwide
through and judicious use of resources to optimize efficiencies and
business outcomes. The methodology involves quantitative technique to
analyze and compare four factors bound up with leadership effectiveness
which are integrative approach, profound strength, visionary and
ethical behaviors. Primary data was obtained through a sample of 300
participants in the survey interview. The responses were scaled to
quantitative data and AMOS model was applied to determine the degree
of correlation among the definitive variables. The results of the study
presented several modalities found around leadership role essentially to
envision and adopt new and relevant strategies, policies and guidelines
to leverage organizational outcomes. It is concluded that a leader must
use integrative approach in decision making, develop internal strength
instead of fixing weakness, contemplate ahead of time and support
ethical behavior and integrity in all decisions. It recommends a sound
competencies development programme for leaders in an integrated
approach and encompassing organizational sustainability.
Perwez Hashmi, Anwar Irshad Burney, Ahsanullah. (2018) Empirical Framework and Analytical Model towards developing Leadership Effectiveness for Organizational Sustainability , Journal of Managerial Sciences, Volume 12, Issue 3.
-
Views
711 -
Downloads
61